On 2012-08-26 at 20:13:21 +0000, Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
> I note that not all 32-bit ints are valid code points. I suppose I can > see sense in having rune be a 32-bit integer value limited to those > valid code points. (But, dammit, why not call it a code point?) But if > rune is merely an alias for int32, why not just call it int32? Having a "code point" type is a good idea. If nothing else, human code readers can tell that you're doing something with characters rather than something with integers. If your language provides any sort of type safety, then you get that, too. Calling your code points int32 is a bad idea for the same reason that it turned out to be a bad idea to call all my old ASCII characters int8. Or all my pointers int<n> (or unsigned int<n>), for n in 16, 20, 24, 32, 36, 48, or 64 (or I'm sure other values of n that I never had the pain or pleasure of using). Dan -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
