On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:57 PM, kj <no.em...@please.post> wrote: > By now I have learned to expect that 99.99% of Python programmers > will find that there's nothing wrong with behavior like the one > described above, that it is in fact exactly As It Should Be, because, > you see, since Python is the epitome of perfection, it follows > inexorably that any flaw or shortcoming one may *perceive* in Python > is only an *illusion*: the flaw or shortcoming is really in the > benighted programmer, for having stupid ideas about programming > (i.e. any idea that may entail that Python is not *gasp* perfect). > Pardon my cynicism, but the general vibe from the replies I've > gotten to my post (i.e. "if Python ain't got it, it means you don't > need it") is entirely in line with these expectations.
Since you have no respect for the people you're writing to, why bother? I know I certainly have no desire to spend any time at all on your problem when you say things like that. Perhaps you're looking for for the argument clinic instead? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDjCqjzbvJY -- Jerry -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
