On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:47:47 +0200, Hans Mulder wrote: > On 8/08/12 04:14:01, Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> NoneType raises an error if you try to create a second instance. bool >> just returns one of the two singletons (doubletons?) again. >> >> py> type(None)() >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> >> TypeError: cannot create 'NoneType' instances > > Why is that? > > Why doesn't it just return an existing instance of the type, like bool, > int, str and other built-in non-mutable types do?
bool must return an instance, because it is designed to cast objects to a boolean. Since (by design) True and False are singletons (doubletons?), bool(x) will always return a pre-existing instance. Other built-in immutable types do not promise to do that. For example: py> a = float(42) py> b = float(42) py> a is b False Sometimes int and str will cache their instances, but this is an implementation detail subject to change without notice from version to version. None, NotImplemented and Ellipsis are singletons, but unlikely bool, there is no common use-case for having their types return the singleton instance. The standard design pattern for singletons is to raise an exception if you try to create an instance, so they do. However, this behaviour really only makes sense for singletons that hold state. (If they hold state, you might be tempted to change that state, not realising that you are changing a singleton and not a second instance.) In my opinion, this is a PITA for None and better behaviour would be to return the pre-existing NoneType instance, but I didn't design the language. -- Steven -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
