Il giorno domenica 12 agosto 2012 23:53:46 UTC+2, Terry Reedy ha scritto: > > Are you actually planning to do this, or is this purely theoretical? >
Yes, I do plan to implement ipow. > > Not true. Whether the function is coded in Python or C > > cls.__ipow__(base, exp, mod) # or > > base.__ipow__(exp, mod) > > > > > while he would be able to > > > call the normal version with the third argument. Yes, that's true. But I find that calling a special-method in that way is *really* ugly. I'd think that the pow built-in function was probably inserted to avoid writing base.__pow__(exp, mod). -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
