On 2012-08-06, Tom P <werot...@freent.dd> wrote:
> On 08/06/2012 06:18 PM, Nobody wrote:
>> On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 17:52:31 +0200, Tom P wrote:
>>
>>> consider a nested loop algorithm -
>>>
>>> for i in range(100):
>>> for j in range(100):
>>> do_something(i,j)
>>>
>>> Now, suppose I don't want to use i = 0 and j = 0 as initial values, but
>>> some other values i = N and j = M, and I want to iterate through all
>>> 10,000 values in sequence - is there a neat python-like way to this?
>>
>> for i in range(N,N+100):
>> for j in range(M,M+100):
>> do_something(i,j)
>>
>> Or did you mean something else?
>
> no, I meant something else ..
>
> j runs through range(M, 100) and then range(0,M), and i runs through
> range(N,100) and then range(0,N)
In 2.x:
for i in range(M,100)+range(0,M):
for j in range(N,100)+range(0,N):
do_something(i,j)
Dunno if that still works in 3.x. I doubt it, since I think in 3.x
range returns an iterator, not?
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I wish I was on a
at Cincinnati street corner
gmail.com holding a clean dog!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
