I just googled the OP's question and found a StackOverflow question. That question's solution mentions pypreprocessor.
On 6 August 2012 08:20, Steven W. Orr <ste...@syslang.net> wrote: > On 8/5/2012 12:43 AM, Ramchandra Apte wrote: > >> Try pypreprocessor >> <http://code.google.com/p/**pypreprocessor/<http://code.google.com/p/pypreprocessor/>> >> . >> Better idea: >> You should be using the logging <http://docs.python.org/** >> library/logging.html <http://docs.python.org/library/logging.html>> >> >> module if you want to print debug information quickly.It uses threads and >> is >> optimized to run fast. >> > > I never saw pypreprocessor. Looks interesting. I have experience with > Ned's cog preprocessor. > > http://nedbatchelder.com/code/**cog/ <http://nedbatchelder.com/code/cog/> > > I used this in something that was operating at the packet socket level. I > had no time to test if debug was true. > > > > -- > Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have > .0. > happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ > ..0 > Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- > 000 > individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question? > steveo at syslang.net > -- > http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/python-list<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list> >
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
