On Sun, 05 Aug 2012 19:12:35 -0400, Roy Smith wrote: >> Good lord. I'd rather read C++ than UML. And I can't read C++. > > UML is under-rated. I certainly don't have any love of the 47 different > flavors of diagram, but the basic idea of having a common graphical > language for describing how objects and classes interact is pretty > useful. Just don't ask me to remember which kind of arrowhead I'm > supposed to use in which situation.
I frequently draw diagrams to understand the relationships between my classes and the problem I am trying to solve. I almost invariably use one type of box and one type of arrowhead. Sometimes if I'm bored I draw doodles on the diagram. If only I could remember to be consistent about what doodle I draw where, I too could be an UML guru. -- Steven -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
