On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:39:58 AM UTC+10, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 05/07/2012 22:46, Evan Driscoll wrote: > > On 01/-10/-28163 01:59 PM, Alexander Blinne wrote: > >> 5+0 is actually 4+0, because 5 == 4, so 5+0 gives 4. > >> 5+1 is actually 4+1, which is 5, but 5 is again 4. > >> 5+2 is 4+2 which is 6. > > > > Now all I can think is "Hoory for new math, new-hoo-hoo math" > :-) > > > > Evan > > It wont do you a bit of good to read new math! > > (My mind was on exactly the same track) > > ~Andrew
+1 -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
