On 6/30/2012 23:45, Evan Driscoll wrote: > You may also > want to put Java in there as well, as < is effectively not commutative > in that language. (I didn't try C#.)
I guess you could actually put Lua and Ruby into the roughly same category as Java too. But things get a little nastier in ==, as 'false == false == false' evaluates as '(false == false) == false' to 'false' in Java and Lua. (Ruby produces a syntax error for this, roughly the Haskell approach.) But we have Javascript: 1 < 1 < 2 => true false == false == false => false O'Caml: # false == false == false;; - : bool = false # 1 < 2 < true;; - : bool = false Java: System.out.println(false == false == false); (outputs) false Lua: > print(false == false == false) false C and C++: std::cout << (1 < 1 < 3) << "\n"; (outputs) 1 std::cout << (false == false == false) << "\n"; (outputs) 0 Evan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
