On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Jason Earl <je...@notengoamigos.org> wrote: > It is considerably worse than that. If you look at what the > documentation for apt-get actually says, instead of just the badly > mangled version that Xah shares you would realize that the post was > basically a bald-face troll.
Not only that, but a completely off-topic one... like a lot of his trolls. What has 'man apt-get' to do with Python? For all I know, the package may be written in Python, or the man page could be generated on-the-fly by a Python script, but unless you say how it's relevant to python-list/c.l.p, it's not obvious. Now, if that were 'man python' that he's criticizing, then sure. But it's not. ChrisA -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
