On Mar 30, 4:37 am, Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Nathan Rice > > <nathan.alexander.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Well, a lisp-like language. I would also argue that if you are using > > macros to do anything, the thing you are trying to do should classify > > as "not natural in lisp" :) > > You would run into disagreement. Some people feel that the lisp > philosophy is precisely that of extending the language to do anything > you want, in the most natural way. > > At least, I disagree, but my lisp thoughts are the result of > indoctrination of the Racket crowd.
I guess Paul Graham would likewise disagree. See 7,8,9 in http://paulgraham.com/diff.html -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
