On 2012-03-28, Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:43:36 +0200, Peter Daum wrote:
>
>> The longer story of my question is: I am new to python (obviously), and
>> since I am not familiar with either one, I thought it would be advisory
>> to go for python 3.x. The biggest problem that I am facing is, that I am
>> often dealing with data, that is basically text, but it can contain
>> 8-bit bytes.
>
> All bytes are 8-bit, at least on modern hardware. I think you have to
> go back to the 1950s to find 10-bit or 12-bit machines.
Well, on anything likely to run Python that's true. There are modern
DSP-oriented CPUs where a byte is 16 or 32 bits (and so is an int and
a long, and a float and a double).
>> As it seems, this would be far easier with python 2.x.
>
> It only seems that way until you try.
It's easy as long as you deal with nothing but ASCII and Latin-1. ;)
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Somewhere in Tenafly,
at New Jersey, a chiropractor
gmail.com is viewing "Leave it to
Beaver"!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
