This week I was slightly surprised by a behaviour that I've not
considered before. I've long used
for i, x in enumerate(seq):
# do stuff
as a standard looping-with-index construct. In Python for loops don't
create a scope, so the loop variables are available afterward. I've
sometimes used this to print or return a record count e.g.
for i, x in enumerate(seq):
# do stuff
print 'Processed %i records' % i+1
However as I found out, if seq is empty then i and x are never
created. The above code will raise NameError. So if a record count is
needed, and the loop is not guaranteed to execute the following seems
more correct:
i = 0
for x in seq:
# do stuff
i += 1
print 'Processed %i records' % i
Just thought it worth mentioning, curious to hear other options/
improvements/corrections.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
