On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:36:52 +0000, Arnaud Delobelle wrote: > On 9 February 2012 14:00, Laurent Claessens <moky.m...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Here is my question: I would like to start an in-house library of >>> small modules to import, for things like error handling/logging. >>> That's easy enough, but is there a recommended way of naming such >>> modules? I am concerned about avoiding name clashes with standard >>> modules and site packages. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> >> This is not 100% an answer to the question, but you should read that : >> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/ > > The OP mentions PEP 8 in the bit of his message that you *don't* quote.
Thank you for that Arnaud, and thanks to Chris R. I'm going along with Chris's suggestion for the moment. One issue I have run into, which may or may not be a problem: I am finding that modules in the in-house "library" package sometimes have to import modules like sys and os, which are also imported by the "calling" module. Is this a problem or an overhead, or does it just result in two names for the same object? Thanks again. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
