Good to see Python3 got rid of that confusion :] Cheers, Xav
On 17 January 2012 16:50, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Xavier Ho <cont...@xavierho.com> wrote: > > What was the rationale behind this design? Specifically, (None < 0) == > True > > and (None == 0) == False? > > > > Personally I would have expected an exception on all tests above. > > Compare with Python 3: > > >>> None<0 > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "<pyshell#31>", line 1, in <module> > None<0 > TypeError: unorderable types: NoneType() < int() > > ChrisA > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list >
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
