Heiko Wundram wrote: > Am 15.01.2012 11:13, schrieb Stefan Behnel: >> That's a stupid design. Using a hash function that the application does >> not control to index into persistent storage just screams for getting the >> code broken at some point. > > I agree completely with that (I hit the corresponding problem with suds > while transitioning from 32-bit Python to 64-bit Python, where hashes > aren't stable either), but as stated in my mail: that wasn't the > original question. ;-)
I'm curious: did you actually get false cache hits or just slower responses? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
