alex23於 2012年1月4日星期三UTC+8上午10時26分35秒寫道： > 88888 Dihedral <dihedr...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > This is a good evolution in Python. It is 2012 now and the text I/O part > > is not as important as 10 years ago. The next move of Python could > > be easy integration of C++ libraries. > > You mean like with Py++? http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyplusplus/ > > > The auto code generation part for low-paid tedious GUI tasks is still > > missing > > in the standard Python. > > Wait, what? How is it the Python community's responsibility to relieve > talentless code-monkeys of their tedium? Why can't they write their > own damn code generators? >
I think a code generator to assist the programmer for common tedious boring GUI jobs such as BOA is more important in Python. But Python is not VB. > > Boa and wxpython are still not good enough. > > And what are you contributing to the situation other than > misinformation and markov-generated spam? Do you know what can attract newbies to support python? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
