On Dec 27 2011, 8:01 pm, Eelco <hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com> wrote: > But I consider it a reasonable change for a > 'python 4', or whatever the next major version change will be called.
You do realise there were 8 years between 2 & 3? You might be waiting for quite some time. Conversely, you could pitch in behind Rick Johnson's Python 4000 fork, I sure it's progressing nicely given how long Rick has been talking it up. > Writing a code-conversion tool to convert from *args to args::tuple > would be quite easy indeed. You might want to ask people maintaining libraries in both 2.x & 3.x via 2to3 just how well that's working out for them. If the impact of changes was trivially obvious, the programming landscape would look very different indeed. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
