On Dec 26, 10:03 pm, Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > You essentially have two completely independent loops that need to run
> > simultaneously with different timings. Sounds like a good case for
> > multiple threads (or processes if you prefer, but these aren:
>
> I accidentally sent before I was finished. I was saying "or processes
> if you prefer, but these aren't CPU-bound, so why complicate things?"
>
> Cheers,
> Ian
I had thought the same workaround but unfortunately loop is already
under a def ;
def writeWaveform(self, fo, header=''):
data1 = numpy.zeros(self.size)
screen = pygame.display.set_mode((0, 0), pygame.FULLSCREEN)
timer = pygame.time.Clock()
white = True
fo.write(header)
start = time.time()
end = time.time() - start
while(end<10):
data1 = self.chan1.getWaveform()
end = time.time() - start
timer.tick(10) #FPS
screen.fill((255,255,255) if white else(0,0,0))
white = not white
pygame.display.update()
for i in range(self.size):
end = time.time() - start
f.write("%3.8f\t%f\n"%(end,data1[i]))
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
