On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 06:47:21 -0800, Eelco wrote:
> I would like to be able to write something like:
>
> a, middle::tuple, b = ::sequence
>
> Where I would like the extra :: before the sequence to explicitly signal
> collection unpacking on the rhs, to maintain the symmetry with
> collection unpacking within a function call.
The :: on the right-hand side is redundant, because the left-hand side
already explicitly signals collection unpacking of the RHS. Requiring ::
on the RHS above is as unnecessary as it would be here:
n = len(::sequence)
--
Steven
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
