On Dec 23, 8:33 pm, Steven D'Aprano <steve +comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote: > On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 06:57:02 -0800, rusi wrote: > > On Dec 23, 6:53 pm, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 12/23/11 1:23 PM, rusi wrote: > [...] > >> > Of course it should be fixed. The repeated recurrence of it as a > >> > standard gotcha as well as the python ideas list testifies to that. > > >> So you were lying when you said that you did not ask or imply that it > >> should be 'fixed'? Please make up your mind. It's quite rude to > >> "defend" your position by constantly shifting it whenever you get > >> challenged on it. > > > Meanings of "should"http://www.englishpage.com/modals/should.htmlMy > > first should was the 3rd one > > My second was the 1st one. > > Rusi, are you a native English speaker? Because that excuse/defense does > not excuse your comments at all, multiple meanings of "should" or not. > Why not just admit to a mistake? After denying you were asking for Python > to fix a so-called bug, you then called for Python to fix it. If this > were a real argument rather than a friendly debate, people would be > crying "Gotcha!" for sure.
Ok You got me! Does that help the OP's? > It's a slick language but I still have trouble wrapping my brain around some > of the concepts. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
