Eelco <hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com> wrote: > To tie it back in with python language design; all the more reason not > to opt for pseudo-backwards compatibility. If python wants a remainder > function, call it 'remainder'. Not 'rem', not 'mod', and certainly not > '%'.
Good luck with the PEP. > Its the more pythonic way; a self-describing name, rather than > poorly defined or poorly understood cryptology. "Although practicality beats purity." I'm still utterly agog that anyone finds the operator % confusing. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list