On 07Nov2011 15:00, gene heskett <ghesk...@wdtv.com> wrote: | On Monday, November 07, 2011 02:43:11 PM Dave Angel did opine: | > On 11/07/2011 11:40 AM, gene heskett wrote: | > > Down toward the bottom of the file, the tab indentations were as high | > > as 33 leading tabs per line. Each stanza of the data was tab | > > indented 2 additional tabs from the one above it in the original | > > file. 30k was perhaps a poor SWAG, but 10 to 15k seems an entirely | > > reasonable guess. | > | > What program are you using to read the file and support that claim? | | vim. But remember, this first one started out as a copy/paste from the | firefox-7.0.1 screen.
I don't suppose you had autoident turned on? I hate using cu/paste to fetch data; _always_ use a "download" link, or use the browser's "save page as" facility. But still, if your MD5 checksums now match... Cheers, -- Cameron Simpson <c...@zip.com.au> DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ Footnotes that extend to a second page are an abject failure of design. - Bringhurst, _The Elements of Typographic Style_ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list