On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:33:27 +0100, jkn <jkn...@nicorp.f9.co.uk> wrote:
FWIW, this looks rather like the 'PAR' construct of Occam to me. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam_%28programming_language%29
I was going to say the same thing. Occam's answer to Stefan's question about what to do if you want more than one statement executed per step was to wrap sequences of statements in a SEQ construct. You end up indenting a long way very fast if you aren't careful. I'm afraid much as I love PAR, Python's dynamicism makes it rather more 'exciting' than it was in occam. -- Rhodri James *-* Wildebeest Herder to the Masses -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
