Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> candide wrote:
>
>> So what is the usefulness of the "not in" operator ? Recall what Zen of
>> Python tells
>>
>> There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.
>
> And "not in" is the obvious way to do it.
>
>
> "If the key is not in the ignition, you won't be able to start the car."
>
> "If not the key is in the ignition, you won't be able to start the car."
>
>
> Who like that second one speaks?
:)
"If the key is not in the ignition, you will be able to start the car, not."
Mel.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
