Re: OO re-factoring (was Pythonese/Efficiency/Generalese critique [on Tutor])

[Lee Cullens]

Than Thanks for the reply Dan, Yes, my take was flawed, and a number of individuals on the Tutor list pointed me in the right direction.   Thanks again, Lee C From: Dan Sommers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: June 8, 2005 8:22:39 AM EDT To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: OO re-factoring (was Pythonese/Efficiency/Generalese critique [on Tutor]) On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 00:52:06 -0400, Lee Cullens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... My thinking is that class/subclass method instances would replace the recursive functions approach, but have as yet not formed the coding in my mind. I don't remember the original post, but methods and recursion are *not* mutually exclusive (e.g., an Integer class with a factorial method, or a binary tree class whose nodes are also binary trees). Regards, Dan --  Dan Sommers <http://www.tombstonezero.net/dan/>

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list