Is the `code` module (http://docs.python.org/library/code.html) an insufficiently exact copy of an interpreter for you?
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Francis Labarre <mephisto_9...@hotmail.com>wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm currently trying to port some embedded code from python 2.7 to python > 3.2. > > The current code replicate the basic behavior of the python interpreter in > an > MFC application. When a command is entered in our embedded interpreter, > we write it to a FILE* then transform this FILE* into a Python file with > the api > function PyFile_FromFile and assign it to python's stdin. We also assign > another > FILE* as python's stdout and stderr. We then call PyRun_InteractiveOne to > execute > the statement as the python interpreter normally would. Finally, we > can easily retrieve > the result of the execution from the output FILE*. > > This is currently the only approach we have found that allows us to > retrieve the > result of executing a statement exactly as the interpreter would. > > The problem is that the implementation of files has changed in python 3 and > the function > PyFile_FromFile has been removed. > > Does anyone knows a way to achieve the same thing as this function either > trough the io module > or the python/C api? Or could there be a better approach to what we are > trying to achieve? > > Keep in mind that we need to obtain the result of any statement, i.e. : > > If the command is "2+2" the result should be "4", if the command is "1/0" > the result should be > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> > ZeroDivisionError: division by zero > > > Thank you, > > F.L. > > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > >
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
