>Dennis Lee Bieber: 
>       Timer() is a one-shot; per the OPs requirements even it would need
> to be placed within a loop to invoke multiple calls -- so there isn't
> much gain in terms of lines of code... And worse, since it calls the
> function asynchronously and not sequentially, a delay time for each
> instance would have to be computed inside the loop too...

The first/last task for the called function may be to instantiate a new Timer - 
depending on what "every 10 secs" means. The OP does not detail his actual 
problem, so I can't see that the async/sequential issue.

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to