John Salerno <johnj...@gmail.com> writes: > I can't quite seem to find the answer to this anywhere. The book I'm > reading right now was written for Python 3.1 and doesn't use (object), > so I'm thinking that was just a way to force new-style classes in 2.x > and is no longer necessary in 3.x. Is that right?
Not as far as I know. Python 2.x classes will not inherit from anything unless you make them do so explicitly. -- \ “People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of | `\ thought which they avoid.” —Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813–1855) | _o__) | Ben Finney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
