On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Martin P. Hellwig > <martin.hell...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 14/06/2011 07:31, Chris Angelico wrote: > > <cut> > >> > >> But if anyone feels like writing an incompatible browser, please can > >> you add Python scripting? > > > > You might find that Pyjamas already fill your needs python/javascript > wise. > > It is truly great to just write python, translate it, and then have it > work > > in the browser. > > I had a (very) quick glance at that; it entails a fairly large library > that has to get loaded. It still comes down to "the only way to > improve this is to dish out a huge helping of .js to everyone who > comes", which imho is unideal. > > That said, though, my context for this job was "tiny thing, just do > the same as you're doing on the back-end". For something larger, I may > well give Pyjamas a whirl. > You probably want Pyajamas + a javascript compressor. I'm a little mystified why people keep talking as though Pyjamas doesn't exist. Granted, it's only Python 2.x, but still.
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
