Chris Torek wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Why do you think there's no Path object in the standard library? *wink*

In article <mailman.16.1308239495.1164.python-l...@python.org>
Ethan Furman  <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
Because I can't find one in either 2.7 nor 3.2, and every reference I've found has indicated that the other Path contenders were too all-encompassing.

What I think Steven D'Aprano is suggesting here is that the general
problem is too hard, and specific solutions too incomplete, to
bother with.

Ah.  In that case I completely misunderstood.  Thanks for the insight!

~Ethan~
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to