Andrea Griffini wrote: >>Of course it is a language, just not a standardized one (if you include >>Borland's extensions that make it practical). > > The history of "runtime error 200" and its handling from > borland is a clear example of what I mean with a product.
Hmm, I had to google this up... Quite embarrassing, but it's a runtime bug and got nothing to do with the language per se. And it certainly manifests itself after the hey-days of Turbo Pascal (when Borland seems to have lost interest in maintaining it.) mkb. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
