Tim Johnson <t...@johnsons-web.com> writes: > If I use > for dummy in range(mylimit): > .... > ## or > for _ in range(mylimit): > .... > I get no complaint from pychecker. > I would welcome comments on best practices for this issue.
I have argued in the past against overloading the name ‘_’ for this <URL:http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2008-January/523777.html> since it has other, unrelated, meanings already established. Other responses in that thread are also useful. -- \ “I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting. | `\ But it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take | _o__) it seriously.” —Douglas Adams | Ben Finney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
