On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: > On 6/9/2011 9:12 PM, Carl Banks wrote: > >> Presumably, the reason you are overriding a method in a subclass is to >> change its behavior; I'd expect an inherited docstring to be inaccurate more >> often than not. So I'd be -1 on automatically inheriting them. >> >> However, I'd be +1 easily on a little help from the language to explicitly >> request to inherit the docstring. > > An empty docstring "" could be interpreted as 'ditto' ;-) > It would be useless otherwise. >
I kind of like that. The only catch is for cases out there where someone used an empty string. Then it would change the behavior, maybe. But how uncommon that is, not sure. I would guess pretty uncommon. Whole implicitly inherit idea would require the empty docstring to say don't do it. With your idea you easily, clearly, and explicitly indicate that you want the inheritance activated. That would work for me. -eric > -- > Terry Jan Reedy > > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
