On 26 Mai, 18:31, Raymond Hettinger <pyt...@rcn.com> wrote:
> I just posted a tutorial and how-to guide for making effective use of
> super().
>
> One of the reviewers, David Beazley, said, "Wow, that's really
> great! I see this becoming the definitive post on the subject"
>
> The direct link is:
>
> http://rhettinger.wordpress.com/2011/05/26/super-considered-super/
I really don't like the Python 2 syntax of super, as it violates
the DRY principle: Why do I need to write super(type(self),self)
when super() will do? Assuming that 'self' will always be named
'self' in my code, I tend to patch __builtins__.super like this:
import sys
def super():
self = sys._getframe().f_back.f_locals['self']
return __builtins__.super(type(self),self)
This way the nice Python 3.x syntax can be used in Python 2.x.
Sturla
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
