>Common to what? I'd try the lowest common denominator of >legibility and effictiveness. >It is just KISS.
Fair enough. I am a sheep, so I do what other (more knowledgeable) people do. It is a fair assumption (for my specific code writing environments) that everyone who is going to read my code understands "if x:" notation or is expected to learn enough Python to understand it. Ramit Ramit Prasad | JPMorgan Chase Investment Bank | Currencies Technology 712 Main Street | Houston, TX 77002 work phone: 713 - 216 - 5423 -----Original Message----- From: python-list-bounces+ramit.prasad=jpmchase....@python.org [mailto:python-list-bounces+ramit.prasad=jpmchase....@python.org] On Behalf Of Hans Georg Schaathun Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 1:16 PM To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: checking if a list is empty On Wed, 11 May 2011 13:50:54 -0400, Prasad, Ramit <ramit.pra...@jpmchase.com> wrote: : I find this argument to be flawed. Should I stop using built-in : generators instead of range/xrange for looping through lists? : Certainly for loops with loop counting are understood more widely : than generators. Should I stop using any advanced feature Python : because it is difficult to understand without knowing Python? No; I'd suggest the most legible and intuitive construct that /does/ the job. Never something which requires one extra (illegible) page to do the job, or something which does not do the job at all. : I may not have made the point well, but I cannot see any advantage : for trying to program for the lowest common denominator. -- :-- Hans Georg -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not necessarily reflect those of JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates. This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. Please refer to http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures for disclosures relating to European legal entities. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
