On May 4, 5:26 pm, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: > The test would be more convincing to many with 100000 other geographic > names (hard to come by, I know), or other english names or words or even > with longer random strings that matched the lengths of the state names. > But an average of 5/100000 false positives in 5 runs is good.
I've just posted an update with a spell checker using a large dictionary. That should make it easy to validate against some real world text samples. Raymond -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
