On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 05:19:29PM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Algis Kabaila <akaba...@pcug.org.au> wrote: > > False: Python IS strongly typed, without doubt (though the > > variables are not explicitly declared.) > > Strongly duck-typed though. If I create a class that has all the right > members, it can simultaneously be a file, an iterable, a database, and > probably even a web browser if it feels like it. Is that strong typing > or not? > > Chris Angelico > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
It's strong typing. Python does not implicitly convert types. Weak typing is when I can do 1 + "1" and get 2. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
