"Matt Feinstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 08:11:36 -0700, Scott David Daniels > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Propose some fixes to the documents that will make this easier for >>the next one in line. You don't even need to get it exactly right; >>the person after you can fix the mistakes you make. This is the >>process we use for this. See this as an opportunity to contribute, >>not simply a frustration about how much you overpaid for the product. > > Which is why I was specific about what I didn't like about the > documentation and why I didn't like it. Seriously, what more should I > do?
If your suggestion is 'small', you can write a suggested sentence or two and post in on the appropriate forum. Something like 'In section xx.y, 2nd para, I wish there had been a sentence saying something like 'connect the frog to the jib and the jib to the boom'. With something like that to go on, an expert can verify and possibly insert/replace. I have done this for the Python docs. > It's plainly inappropriate for me to write documentation for a > module that I'm still struggling to learn. You know better than any expert where you got lost and what you wish had been said ;-) Terry J. Reedy -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
