I'm probably going off on a tangent here......but has anybody seen any efforts to allow python to "import modules via a socket" ...rather then just a "dir path" ?
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:56 PM, eryksun () <eryk...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, March 14, 2011 9:45:51 AM UTC-4, eryksun () wrote: > > > > If you're linking to a common file, couldn't you just add in > > the base folder there? > > > > ... > > > > # script.py > > import _path # _path.py is a symbolic link > > > > # _path.py: > > base = '/absolute/path/to/base' > > import site > > site.addsitedir(base) > > To be clear on the file structure, I'm picturing that 'base' is a path on > each user's shell path where all the accessible scripts are linked, and that > this is also the package directory. So when a linked script runs "import > _path" it will import the _path.py that's located in base, which adds the > base path to Python's sys.path. On the other hand, any subsequently imported > modules will be found by searching sys.path. Thus each subdirectory needs > the additional symbolic link back to the base _path.py. It's a bit > convoluted, but so are the constraints of this problem -- at least to me. > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list >
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
