I'm starting to run out of ideas of what to do...I've imported the true division (I'm using Python 2.7) to make sure I wasn't accidentally using any integers but the results remain identical, so it's not a division problem. I've copied the loop I'm running below, is there any mathematical operation I am making here that may have an accuracy problem? Thanks for any advice you can give!
Xold=X told=t if abs(dt) > abs(tf-t): dt = tf-t k[:,0]=F(mu, Xold, told) for n in range(1,13): nn=n-1 Xtemp1=zeros(neq) for j in range(nn): Xtemp1 = Xtemp1 + b[n,j] * k[:,j] Xtemp1 X=Xold+ dt * Xtemp1 t=told+a[n]*dt k[:,n]=F(mu, X, 0) Xtemp2=zeros(neq) for l in range(13): Xtemp2=Xtemp2+c[l]*k[:,l] X=Xold + dt * Xtemp2 t=told+dt Xstore=vstack((Xstore,X)) tstore=vstack((tstore,t)) if abs(tf-t)< 1e-14: print('At tf') break On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Jon Herman <jfc.her...@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually, I import numpy in my code for array creation...in the > documentation I did not manage to find anything that would solve this > precision problem I mentioned however. If you're familiar with it, would you > happen to know what capability of numpy might solve my problem? > > > > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Santoso Wijaya > <santoso.wij...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Have you taken a look at numpy? [1] It was written for exactly this kind >> of usage. >> >> ~/santa >> >> [1] http://numpy.scipy.org/ >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Jon Herman <jfc.her...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> I am new to the Python language and writing a Runge-Kutta-Fellberg 7(8) >>> integrator in Python, which requires an extreme numerical precision for my >>> particular application. Unfortunately, I can not seem to attain it. >>> The interesting part is if I take my exact code and translate it to >>> Matlab code (so I use the exact same process and numbers), I get a far >>> superior precision (the one I am expecting, in fact). This leads me to think >>> I need to call a certain command in my Python script in order to make sure >>> no truncation errors are building up over my integration. >>> >>> Has anyone had similar problems? Is there a difference between how Matlab >>> and Python store numbers, and if so how do I make Python more accurate? >>> >>> I know there is a lot of packages out there, but this in fact overwhelmed >>> me a little bit and seems to prevent me from finding the answer to my >>> question, so I'm hoping someone with more experience will be able to >>> enlighten me! >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Jon >>> >>> -- >>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list >>> >>> >> >
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list