n00m <n...@narod.ru> writes: > On Mar 6, 10:17 pm, n00m <n...@narod.ru> wrote: >> On Mar 6, 8:55 pm, John Bokma <j...@castleamber.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > n00m <n...@narod.ru> writes: >> > >http://www.nga.gov/search/index.shtm >> > >http://deyoung.famsf.org/search-collections >> > > etc >> > > Seems they all offer search only by keywords and this kind. >> > > What about to submit e.g. roses2.jpg (copy) and to find its >> > > original? Assume we don't know its author neither its title >> >> > Title: TinEye, author:http://ideeinc.com/ >> > Search:http://www.tineye.com/ >> >> > Example: >> > http://www.tineye.com/search/2b3305135fa4c59311ed58b41da5d07f213e4d47/ >> >> > Notice how it finds modified images. >> >> > -- >> > John Bokma >> > j3b >> >> > Blog:http://johnbokma.com/ Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/j.j.j.bokma >> > Freelance Perl & Python Development:http://castleamber.com/ >> >> It's for kids. >> Such trifles can easily be cracked by e.g. Jorgen Grahn's algo (see >> his message) > > > Even his algo will be an overhead. > Comparing meta-data/EXIF of image files will be enough in 99% cases.
Yes, yes, we get it. You're so much smarter (but not smart enough to not quote a signature...). Anyway, I guess that's the reason big names use tineye and not your algorithm... -- John Bokma j3b Blog: http://johnbokma.com/ Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/j.j.j.bokma Freelance Perl & Python Development: http://castleamber.com/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
