alex23 <wuwe...@gmail.com> writes: > On Feb 22, 12:57 pm, Kelson Zawack <zawack...@gis.a-star.edu.sg> > wrote: >> I did not bother to further analyze or benchmark it. Since the answers >> in the above forums do not seem very definitive I thought I would >> inquire here about what the reason for this decrease in performance is, >> and if there is a way, or another data structure, that would avoid this >> problem. > > The first link is 6 years old and refers to Python 2.4. Unless you're > using 2.4 you should probably ignore it. > > The first answer on the stackoverflow link was accepted by the poster > as resolving his issue. Try disabling garbage collection.
I just read http://bugs.python.org/issue4074 which discusses a patch that has been included 2 years ago. So using a recent Python 2.x also doesn't have this issue? -- John Bokma j3b Blog: http://johnbokma.com/ Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/j.j.j.bokma Freelance Perl & Python Development: http://castleamber.com/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
