On Feb 16, 12:48 am, Eric Brunel <eric.bru...@pragmadev.nospam.com> wrote: > In article <iJg5p.198317$mg5.147...@en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com>, > Doug Epling <wde...@mikrotec.com> wrote: > > > hey, does anyone find the UML useful during Python development of larger > > projects? > > Well, UML being very Java/C++ oriented, I found out that Python idioms > were really difficult to represent in the diagrams. So I'm using it to a > very small extent and for documentation only, just to give an idea about > how classes are organized. For the rest, and IMHO, it's really too > impractical to be of any use.
Which of the 13 diagrams have tried and rejected?-) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
