In article <mailman.13.1297183120.1633.python-l...@python.org>, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Unlike a UNIX fork, CreateProcess() does not have the same copy-on-write > semantics for initializing the memory of the new process. If you want to pass > data to the children, the data must be pickled and sent across the process > boundary. He's not saying that multiprocessing isn't useful at all on > Windows, just less useful for the scenarios he is considering here. Amen, brother! I used to work on a project that had a build system which was very fork() intensive (lots of little perl and shell scripts driven by make). A full system build on a linux box took 30-60 minutes. Building the same code on windows/cygwin took about 12 hours. Identical hardware (8-core, 16 gig Dell server, or something like that). As far as we could tell, it was entirely due to how bad Windows was at process creation. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list