On Jan 24, 8:49 am, Mike Driscoll <kyoso...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 24, 7:24 am, Bryan <bryan.oak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In my experience, segfaults with wxPython aren't daily, but they are > > pretty much weekly. There are weeks that can go by without them, but > > then I'll have several in a week to bump up the average. > > I've only run my code on Windows and Linux, but I haven't had this > issue. The only time I've had segfaults was when I was first learning > how to get threading and wx to work properly and when I was creating > binaries with py2exe. Thanks. I knew these guys were full of it. > On a completely different note, as a heavy wxPython user for almost 5 > years, I have never seen the OP on our mailing list, dev group or IRC > channel. Thats because i have not been there. And yet i can produce code (maybe not perfectly). However those that have been around wx list for longer cannot. Interesting. > I like the concept of > creating a challenge to see which toolkit can do what, but this is not > the way to go about it. Well by all means offer some input. You have offered opinions but no ideas. I would love to hear any ideas you may have. And yes, Tkinter has a very likable API. I have mentioned this fact many times and in many threads. However when weighed on all factors wx will win. Because even though we may need to mold the wx API a bit, at least with wx we have a solid feature rich platform to work from. > Bryan, on the other hand, has been a Tkinter luminary who has helped > me in the past when I was learning Tkinter and I won't be too > surprised if he helps me again. I'm sorry he's had so much trouble > with wx though. :) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list