On Nov 24, 11:46 am, Gerald Britton <gerald.brit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Say that I have some function "f" that I will execute if some variable > "v" evaluates true. Using a classical procedural approach, I might > write: > > if v: > f() > > I might, however, think more in a functional-programming direction. > Then I might write: > > v and f()
The idea that "if" is inherently procedural is mistaken. Functional programming emphasizes the use of functions (in the mathematical sense) over changes in state. Assuming that f has no side effects, either of the above could equally be viewed as functional. (Of course, the fact that the return value is simply discarded in both of the above cases suggests that f *does* have side effects, in which case neither of the above should be viewed as functional.) That said, the 'if' version is clearer, so I would nearly always go with that. The rare exception would be if I were genuinely interested in capturing the value of "v" if it evaluated false. I can't remember the last time that was the case. Cheers, Ian -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
