On 11/21/2010 11:38 PM, Ertugrul Söylemez wrote: > "Jon Harrop" <use...@ffconsultancy.com> wrote: > >> "Ertugrul Söylemez" <e...@ertes.de> wrote in message >> news:20101014052650.510e8...@tritium.streitmacht.eu... >> >>> That's nonsense. >> >> Actually namekuseijin is right. You really need to persevere and >> familiarize yourself with some of the other languages out >> there. Haskell is many things but simple is not one of them. If >> Haskell were half of the things you think it is, it would have more >> credible success stories. > > Jon, I don't care about your opinion, because it's biased. If you were > to advocate Haskell in any way, you would lose money. So you must fight > it where possible. This makes all your postings about Haskell (and many > other languages) meaningless and reading them a waste of time. > > Haskell is a simple language with a comparably small specification. > It's not as simple as Common Lisp, but it's simple. Note that simple > doesn't mean easy. Haskell is certainly more difficult to learn than > other languages, which explains the low number of success stories. On > the other hand, I'm doing rapid web development in it. > > After all there aren't many CL success stories either, but Paul Graham's > story [1] speaks for itself. > > [1] http://www.paulgraham.com/avg.html > Perhaps we could take this thread to alt.small.minded.bickering now?
regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 PyCon 2011 Atlanta March 9-17 http://us.pycon.org/ See Python Video! http://python.mirocommunity.org/ Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
