On Nov 5, 5:51 pm, Seebs <usenet-nos...@seebs.net> wrote: > On 2010-11-05, Nobody <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote: > > > However, it's still written for language lawyers. > > IMHO, the lack of a reference manual for the language itself is a major > > hole in Python's documentation. > > I'm a bit lost here. Could you highlight some of the differences > between "a reference manual for the language itself" and "something > written for language lawyers"?
In a word HUMOR! Obviously the commentator who has a lack of the hidden meaning of "language lawyers" has no sense of humor -- sadly another lost virtue of the French! -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
