In message <0f1a17f4-b6a9-4e89-ac26-74b1098a0...@b19g2000prj.googlegroups.com>, goodman wrote:
> Hi, I'm wondering why subprocess.Popen does not seem to replace the > current process, even when it uses os.execvp (according to the > documentation: > http://docs.python.org/library/subprocess.html#subprocess.Popen). You’ll notice that in the list at the top of the functions that subprocess replaces, there are no os.exec* entries. subprocess is only for spawning new processes; if all you need to do is an exec, do an exec <http://docs.python.org/library/os.html#process-management>; subprocess can’t offer anything to make that any simpler. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list